Just watched the Colbert Report,   interview with New York Times columnist Jon Mooallem. The topic of   discussion was gay animals, that it recent research into animal behavior   have shown lots of species of animals have same sex sexual activities.   And that brought about the discussion of whether discrimination  against  gay people because one popular argument is that being gay is  unnatural.  So if animals are doing it, that throws that argument out  the window.
Jon  Mooallem then says that talking  point could easily be altered given  that the proof that animals do have  same sex behavior. The argument can  then be that surely humans are  intelligent creatures and wild animals  are not. So what gay people are  doing is an abomination, behaving like  animals.
With regards to both these arguments, we should not be  looking  for validation from animals whether gay right or wrong. Humans  indeed  are more intelligent being and we do things that animals cannot.  So if  it is how people are, why is it wrong to be straight or gay? I  guess it  could be argued that gay people cannot reproduce by  conventional means.  And I have no argument for that, it seems unnatural  in that sense. This  is the only physiological aspect I can think of  that would support that  argument.
I myself  believe being gay is  natural in that you cannot choose to be gay or  straight, it is who you  are. Being straight does not mean you are a  better person than a gay  person. Neither does it mean if you are gay  you are any better than a  straight person. It is certainly part of your  identity but it is no  measure of morality. If a gay person cheats, it  is still cheating.
If say one child was raised by  caring  loving gay parents, and another by abusive a conventional (1  father 1  mother) family, which is better? Or vice versa? I believe the  only  important words in that question is caring loving, and abusive.   Generalizing and discriminating on sexual orientation is ridiculous.
 
No comments:
Post a Comment